Being is the essence out of which all things evolve. This blog is an ongoing conversation of being in various facets and areas of life, including the personal and the professional from which relationships of all kinds are formed and teams built in all communities, virtual or real, at home, at work, in politics and at play.
Tuesday, February 28, 2012
Being Named
What's in a name? While watching the extraordinary documentary Oceans where underwater life is beautifully documented, the names of amazing creatures struck me as so appropriate. Color, movement, form and habit made it so. But before naming and knowing existence was. The sense of appropriateness is based on pre-existent knowledge, not omniscient knowing. We are discovering what has already been. Again, I ask, what's in a name?
Monday, January 30, 2012
Being Confident
"Cast not away therefore your confidence, which hath great recompense of reward."
--Hebrews 10:35
Being Creative
In preparation of upcoming performances I have been listening to recordings of great jazz singers and instrumentalists. In imitation creation begins.
Being Complex
Complexity is generally the genesis of the path to understanding, not understanding itself.
Being Forever Aware of Fascism
Conservative Zionism attempts to silence the voices of justice and the equality of peoples based on a sense of righteousness. In a letter to the New York Times Albert Einstein outlines the danger of fascism shortly after the formation of Israel in 1948. While Menachem Begin's leadership is rightfully questioned here, it is good to see that he had evolved beyond his terrorist fundamentalism as Prime Minister with the signing of the Camp David Accords in 1979. But the actions of the Israeli Defense Force during the 1982 Lebanon War in Sabra and Shatila where Lebanese and Palestinian civilians were mascaraed tarnishes the honor of the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to him. We must always be aware. Fascism forever rears its ugly head.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Being Ron Paul
While it is not surprising that Ron Paul according to the Washington Post was "deeply involved with his company that produced" those despicable racist newsletters and even wrote them as others have suggested, what is the worst scenario--continued corporatist control, war, and Wall Street looting? After all, many of our founding fathers owned slaves. Does that make the Constitution and Bill of Rights of no effect? I don't think I can vote for Ron Paul, although I respect some of his positions. But if the government goes broke and our constitutional rights are constantly being thwarted via legal means including congressional laws and Supreme Court decisions by believed non-racists or concealed ones (Clinton is excused for his racist comments during the primaries), we all go down. Blacks and other minorities will be first. Again I ask, which is worst?
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Being Barack Obama
In his State of the Union address Obama reveled in his accomplishment that Osama bin Laden and other top Al Qaeda leaders are no longer a threat to Americans. It was a strong opening. But the problem with such assassinations is that any opposition to others can be considered assassination-worthy for the security of a country and its people. As Israel has long engaged in targeted killings, it is significant that Andrew Adler, the owner of the Atlanta Jewish Times, wrote that the assassination of Obama should be an option for the Israeli government for the security of Israel and her people. Besides the legality of such acts of war among governing bodies nationally or internationally, is there not a better way?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)